DJI Avata 2 Mule Deer Back Yard

Just posted an 8-minute FPV flight with the DJI Avata 2, soaring around my backyard in the beautiful Langley area of British Columbia, Canada. The landscape is all farmland, fields, trees, houses, and that classic two-lane country road. I did some swooping low through the trees and climbing high for scenic shots. Even chased a couple trucks down that road briefly! The highlight? I flew in close to a mother mule deer and her two fawns, got an amazing view! A fun mix of high, low, and smooth backyard flying in BC!

Lordhair Neo Hair System Full Review

In this video you might notice there’s something a little different about me in it… yeah, it’s the hair. No, I didn’t suddenly regrow it overnight or find some miracle supplement, this is actually a hair system.

So this one is from Lordhair, and the reason I wanted to try it is pretty simple. I didn’t want to go the transplant route, I didn’t want anything permanent, but I did like the idea of having the option to have hair again when I feel like it. Kind of like something you can put on for a night out, a weekend, or just to change things up.

Right out of the box, I was honestly impressed. The hair looks really realistic, the texture feels good, and overall it’s a pretty convincing system. This one is a full top piece, so it completely changes your look, not just filling in a small area.

Now the install process… that’s where things get a bit more involved. You’ve got to prep your scalp, apply the tape, then glue down the front in layers and let it dry in between. It’s not super complicated, but it’s definitely not something you rush, especially the first time. I actually had to redo mine once because it folded over in the back, so there’s a bit of a learning curve.

One thing I’ll say, make sure you get good glue. I cheaped out on one from Amazon and it showed up basically solid, completely unusable, so I had to run out and grab a proper one last minute. Lesson learned there.

Once it’s on, the real difference comes when you get it cut and styled. I went to a local barber and had him shape it into more of an undercut style, which works well because you don’t have to blend as much with the sides. After that, it really started to come together.

And honestly, when I saw the final result, it kind of took me back. It looks really similar to how my hair was back in my late 20s, same kind of thickness, similar wave, even the color is pretty close, although I might go a bit lighter next time with a bit mroe grey in it (Mine was 10% grey).

Now after wearing the Lordhair System for about a week, it actually feels a lot more normal than I expected. You sleep in it, you wake up with bedhead, you style it, it behaves like real hair. Maintenance hasn’t been too bad either. The only thing is the front edge can lift slightly sometimes, so I just press it back down and it’s good to go.

The biggest adjustment hasn’t been the system itself though, it’s been people’s reactions. I’ve been bald for about 15 years, so going from that to a full head of hair is a pretty big shock for people. Some laugh, some think I’m joking, some don’t know what to say at all. But honestly, after a few minutes, everything just goes back to normal.

As for whether it’s worth it, I think it really depends on what you’re looking for. These systems last around three to four months adn the starting cost is arounbd $370 US per hair unit, so it’s not a one-time thing, there’s some ongoing cost and maintenance. But compared to something permanent, it gives you flexibility. You can wear it when you want, take it off when you don’t, and change things up over time.

For me, I actually like it. I think it looks good. I’m just not totally sure yet if this is going to be an all-the-time thing or something I use once in a while. That’s something I’ll figure out over time.

But yeah, let me know what you think, does it look real? Would you try something like this? 

• Make sure to use my Discount Code (MIKE20) if you plan on visiting Lordhair and giving a Hair System a try!

Lordhair Neo Hair System - Unboxing & First Look

This is a bit of a different direction for me. If you’ve followed my channel for a while, you’ll know I’ve been rocking the shaved head look with SMP (scalp micropigmentation) for years. It’s worked well and I still think it suits me, but like a lot of guys, there’s always that curiosity about what it would be like to have a full head of hair again, even if it’s just occasionally.

That’s what led me to reach out to Lordhair and try one of their systems. They sent over their All-In-One Neo Hair System, and this video is focused purely on the unboxing and first impressions. A full before-and-after and install process will be covered in a seperate vidoe...

First Impressions & What You Get

Right out of the box, the presentation is solid. Everything is packaged cleanly, and it feels more like a complete kit than just a standalone product.

Included in the box:

• The Neo hair system (8” x 10” base)
• Ultra-hold adhesive tapes (including contour strips)
• Measuring tape (for sizing and future reference)
• Marking pencils (for hairline placement)
• Styling comb (rat-tail style for precision)
• Cotton pads for application/cleanup
• A stand for holding the system during prep or cleaning
• Instructional materials and product guides

It’s clear they’re trying to make this approachable for first-time users, which matters because this isn’t something most people are already experienced with.

The System Itself

The specific configuration I went with:

• Color: Dark brown (210) with ~10% grey blend
• Density: Medium-light 100% (natural look, not overly thick)
• Front contour: A-contour (slightly curved hairline)
• Cut style: LD0055 (pre-styled option)
• Feature: Xyrosen antibacterial treatment (up to 99.9%)

The system uses a hybrid base design:

• Lace (mesh) sections for breathability
• Reinforced perimeter areas for easier taping or gluing

This is a practical balance, comfort where you need airflow, durability where you need adhesion.

Hairline & Realism

One of the more important details—and something you notice right away, is the bleached front knots. This helps the hairline blend into the skin much more naturally.

When placed against the skin, the base material is surprisingly subtle. It doesn’t stand out the way you might expect, which is key if you’re going for a realistic look. The grey blending also adds to that realism, especially for anyone over 40 where a perfectly dense, dark hairline can look unnatural.

Cost & Practical Considerations

For context, a system like this typically runs around $370 US, depending on options. Expected lifespan is roughly 3–4 months before replacement.

Compared to other options:

• Hair transplants: significantly more expensive and invasive
• SMP: higher upfront cost plus ongoing touch-ups
• Barbers: recurring cost over time

This sits somewhere in the middle with a lower commitment, lower risk, and more flexibility.

Early Takeaways

From a first look standpoint:

Pros

• Complete kit with useful extras
• Natural-looking density and grey blend
• Breathable hybrid design
• Good attention to hairline realism

Considerations

• Learning curve for first-time installation
• Ongoing maintenance required
• Results will depend heavily on application and blending

What’s Next

This is just the starting point. The real test will be:

• Installation process
• How it blends with my natural hair
• Comfort over time
• Durability with daily wear

I’ll be covering all of that in a separate Hair System Review / Before & After video, so make sure to check that out once it’s live.

This is one of those things that can either look incredibly natural or completely off depending on execution. So far, though, the quality and attention to detail look promising.

• If you're interested in a Hair System from Lordair, make sure ot take advantage of my $20 0ff discount, use Promo Code MIKE20 at the till.

The Ultimate Compact Spatial Computing Solution

This setup is about building a real-world usable XR system using modular components, XR glasses paired with devices like the InAir Pod or XREAL Beam Pro to create an immersive experience similar in concept to the "Apple Vision Pro", but in a way that is:

• Far more portable

• Much less expensive

• Socially usable in public

• Flexible depending on your workflow

Rather than relying on a single all-in-one headset, this approach focuses on combining the best parts of different devices to achieve a balanced experience. 

• XR Glasses Comparison (Real Use Differences) 

XREAL Air (Original / Nreal)

• 1080p per eye

• Lower brightness and smaller field of view

• No onboard processing for stabilization

In practice, these feel like a first-generation experience. They still work, but:

• Dimmer image

• Less immersive

• No true screen locking without software

They rely heavily on apps like Nebula, which is no longer well supported making them less viable today.

XREAL Air 1S (Key Standout)

• ~1200p per eye

• ~52° field of view

• Built-in chip for stabilization and tracking

• Native 2D → 3D conversion

This is where the experience changes significantly.

The onboard chip allows:

• Rock-solid screen locking

• Minimal jitter or tearing

• A display that feels like a real physical monitor in space

Compared to software-based solutions, this is noticeably better. It works consistently across devices like:

• MacBook (even older M2 systems)

• Samsung DeX on phones

For productivity and stability, this is currently the strongest option.

VITURE Luma Ultra

• Similar resolution and field of view

• Multiple cameras for spatial tracking

• Relies on external software (SpaceWalker)

On paper, it should compete directly, but in real use:

• More screen tearing and flicker

• Less smooth tracking

• Frequent crashing (Mac + mobile)

• Audio inconsistencies

Because it depends on software instead of onboard processing, the experience varies by device and often feels unstable compared to XREAL 1S.

Spatial Tracking & 6DoF

• XREAL Air 1S + XREAL Eye:

  • Reliable 6DoF with good lighting

  • Stable tracking due to onboard processing

• VITURE Luma Ultra:

  • Uses multiple cameras

  • Still limited by software performance

Key takeaway:
Hardware-based tracking beats software-based tracking for consistency.

• Setting the Immersive Stage

XREAL Beam Pro

• Built specifically for XREAL ecosystem

• Supports spatial UI and multiple windows

• Can record spatial overlays (useful for demos)

However:

• Performance drops with multiple windows

• Noticeable jitter during video playback

• Limited to ~2 usable windows smoothly

It looks good in theory, but lacks the smoothness needed for real productivity.

InAir Pod (Most Practical Option)

• Works across multiple XR glasses

• More stable overall performance

• Flexible ecosystem support

Limitations:

• Some features not fully implemented on all glasses

• Window system isn’t fully “true spatial” yet on XREAL 1S

Example limitation:

• You can lock a screen in space

• But multiple app windows stay inside that fixed frame instead of spreading across your environment

Despite this, it still delivers the best overall balance today.

Pointer Functionality: The Missing Piece

While neither the XREAL Beam Pro nor the InAir Pod currently offers full hand tracking, both devices do allow you to use them as effective pointer tools. In practice, this means you can navigate and control apps using a virtual cursor, so, in some cases, it actually works even better than hand gestures. You point with the device in front of you, and the cursor moves smoothly on the screen, allowing you to interact with your virtual desktop.

That said, the lack of hand tracking is a real limitation, especially if you’re looking for something like Apple’s Vision Pro, which has advanced hand gestures. Right now, the VITURE Neckband Pro is the only one offering hand tracking, and from what I’ve heard, it’s pretty good though still not on par with the Apple Vision Pro.

Onboard 3D Cameras

Another note: the XREAL Beam Pro, with its onboard 3D cameras, does produce impressive color and contrast 1080p side-by-side recording. But despite claims of 60 frames per second recording, it breaks down. In some parts of the file, you get more like 15 or 20 frames per second, which is a real letdown. Even switching to 30 frames per second, you still see lost frames. So, while it sounds great on paper, the Beam Pro’s hardware just doesn’t always deliver that smooth, consistent frame rate, leaving a bit to be desired.

What Actually Matters (Real Insight)

After testing multiple setups, one thing becomes clear:

Smoothness is more important than features

You can have:

• 6DoF tracking

• Multiple floating windows

• Spatial UI

-but if the experience:

• Jitters

• Tears

• Crashes

-it immediately breaks immersion. That’s where the XREAL Air 1S stands out—it consistently delivers a stable visual experience, which is more important than having every feature. 

• Real-World Use Cases

This setup is not just for experimenting, it’s actually usable day-to-day:

Portable Workstation

• Samsung DeX = full desktop environment

• Phone screen becomes trackpad

• Add a foldable Bluetooth keyboard for complete system

Coffee Shop / Travel Setup

• No bulky laptop required

• Fits in a small bag

• Easy to set up anywhere

Content Consumption

• Large virtual screen anywhere

• Built-in 2D → 3D conversion (XREAL 1S)

• Works well for video, browsing, and media

Cost vs Value

Typical setup:

• XREAL Air 1S

• InAir Pod

Approximate cost:

• ~$1,000 USD

• ~$1,300 CAD

Compared to:

• Apple Vision Pro: $3,000–$4,000+

You’re getting:

• A similar concept of spatial computing

• At a fraction of the cost

• In a far more portable form

How Close Is It to Apple Vision Pro?

Similarities:

• Floating UI in space

• Layered windows

• Immersive content viewing

• Optional 3D experiences

Differences:

• Smaller field of view

• No full passthrough immersion

• Less advanced interaction (no eye tracking, limited hand tracking)

Advantages:

• Lightweight and discreet

• Usable in public

• Modular and flexible

• Significantly cheaper

Final Recommendation

Best Overall Setup (Right Now):

• XREAL Air 1S

• InAir Pod

Why:

• Most stable experience

• Best balance of features and usability

• Works across multiple scenarios

Final Takeaway

If your goal is:

• A compact, immersive XR experience

• That you can actually use daily

• Without spending thousands

• And without wearing a full headset in public

This modular approach delivers one of the most practical and realistic alternatives available right now. While it may not surpass high-end headsets in every technical measure, it excels in real-world usability, portability, and affordability, giving you a believable XR workspace wherever you go.